Free Safety Downloads
on the Resources page
Search:

New home of 4-Safety.com

 

Questions? Call Us: 1-877-230-4080


Safety News
Safety of subcontractor’s workers a concern for all: industry lawyer

Brook Restoration holds event in response to recent fatalities

To ensure a job site is truly safe, the safety of a subcontractor’s workers is a responsibility which cannot be overlooked, safety and legal experts said recently to a crew of Brook Restoration foremen.

“Never assume on the job site you are not responsible for the workers of a subcontractor,” said Frank Crewe, a Bond Law attorney and Brook’s legal counsel. “You have to look out for the safety of their workers just as much as your own.”

Brooks management put together the safety training session after the Christmas Eve swing-stage tragedy at a Metron Construction Corp. jobsite on Kipling Avenue, which claimed four construction worker lives when a swing-stage came apart 13 storeys above the ground.

The company gathered about 30 of its foremen to discuss site safety, including swing stage and fall-arrest equipment issues and procedures.

The Jan. 12 session included presentations from Brook management, a Construction Safety Association of Ontario field consultant, Crewe and Cory Carter, president of Barantas Inc., an independent safety consultant.

Barantas has conducted more than 30 inspections of Brook work sites since October 2009 and has never found a worker not tied-off, noted Carter, but he did want to clear up a misconception that a subtrade’s safety is their responsibility alone.

“When a subtrade is on the site, the supervisor of that site, like Brook who has hired that subtrade, is now responsible for that subtrade,” Carter explained. “You are just as responsible for them because you have hired them on to do the work. You need to be responsible and cognitive of what everyone on your site is doing.”

Both Crewe and Carter commended Brook management for organizing the safety session so soon after the swing-stage incident.

Crewe also stressed in his presentation that a worker’s safety is not his alone to ensure. If someone is not wearing a hard hat or fall-arrest equipment they need to be confronted and the incident needs to be documented.

“You cannot hide behind subcontractors — if they are hired by your company, and you are the supervisor, you are just as responsible,” he said.

“If a guy falls that was not tied off and gets hurt, you can get charged individually as a supervisor (and) your company and the roofer can be charged as well. Anyone is liable.”

With ongoing Ontario Ministry of Labour and Toronto Police investigations into the Dec. 24 incident, Crewe suspects criminal charges could result.

The federal government’s changes to the Criminal Code, flowing from the inquest into the 1992 Westray mining disaster in Nova Scotia, allows for companies and individuals that work for companies to be prosecuted under the Criminal Code for workplace accidents.

“In addition to the Occupational Health and Safety Act you can be prosecuted under the Criminal Code for criminal negligence where there is a serious body injury or death,” said Crewe. “You are not doing anyone any favours by letting someone take shortcuts. Shortcuts inevitably lead to accidents and they do not save money, but cost money.”

 
“This accident was preventable,” said Charles Adkins, OSHA’s regional administrator
 

OSHA fines local company

Agency rules in electrocution of York man

 
Published: Thursday, October 29, 2009 1:20 AM CDT
YORK — The Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA) has fined a local company, saying its work practices contributed to the death of a worker last summer.

OSHA has been investigating the death of Korey Schall, 23, of York, since the fatal work accident on Aug. 21. Initially, there was no confirmed cause of Schall’s death, although there were indications from emergency response agencies that is could have been the result of an electrocution.

York County Attorney Tim Sieh announced the investigation after an autopsy was performed. At that point, Sieh said his office would be releasing no further information and that the investigation was being solely handled by OSHA. The results of the autopsy were never released.

Schall was a foreman for Crane and Grain Service in York, working at a rural site when the accident occurred. Formal details of the accident were not released; however, OSHA says that three company violations played a role in Schall’s death. OSHA officials say he “was injured by electricity while assembling a grain bin on a farm near York and later died.” The agency says “an improperly wired flexible cord was in use at the time of the accident.” And OSHA said the company “used damaged ladders and didn’t properly train workers on ladder use.”

“This accident was preventable,” said Charles Adkins, OSHA’s regional administrator in Kansas City, Mo. “Employers need to be proactive in addressing safety issues to ensure their workplaces are safe and healthful.”

The local company has been ordered to pay a $9,300 fine. Crane and Grain Service has 15 business days from receipt of these citations to comply, request an informal conference with OSHA’s area director in Omaha or contest the findings before the OSHA review commission.
Top Violations Are Up Almost 30 Percent Since Last Year
 Top Violations Are Up Almost 30 Percent Since Last Year

ORLANDO, Fla., Oct. 27 /PRNewswire-USNewswire/ -- The U.S. Department of
Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA) has revealed the
preliminary top 10 most-frequent workplace safety violations for 2009 as part
of a presentation at the NSC's annual Congress & Expo. The number of top 10
violations has increased almost 30 percent over the same time period in 2008. 

"We appreciate our colleagues at OSHA presenting their new violation data to
such a receptive audience," said National Safety Council President and CEO
Janet Froetscher. "The sheer number of violations gives us new resolve in
raising awareness about the importance of having sounds safety procedures."

The workplace violations are:

1. Scaffolding - 9,093 violations
Scaffold accidents most often result from the planking or support giving way,
or from the employee slipping or being struck by a falling object.

2. Fall Protection - 6,771 violations
Any time a worker is at a height of four feet or more, the worker is at risk
and needs to be protected. Fall protection must be provided at four feet in
general industry, five feet in maritime and six feet in construction.

3. Hazard Communication - 6,378 violations
Chemical manufacturers and importers are required to evaluate the hazards of
the chemicals they produce or import, and prepare labels and safety data
sheets to convey the hazard information to their downstream customers.

4. Respiratory Protection - 3,803 violations
Respirators protect workers against insufficient oxygen environments, harmful
dusts, fogs, smokes, mists, gases, vapors and sprays. These hazards may cause
cancer, lung impairment, other diseases or death.

5. Lockout-Tag out - 3,321 violations
"Lockout-Tag out" refers to specific practices and procedures to safeguard
employees from the unexpected startup of machinery and equipment, or the
release of hazardous energy during service or maintenance activities.

6. Electrical (Wiring) - 3,079 violations
Working with electricity can be dangerous. Engineers, electricians and other
professionals work with electricity directly, including working on overhead
lines, cable harnesses, and circuit assemblies. Others, such as office workers
and sales people, work with electricity indirectly and may also be exposed to
electrical hazards.

7. Ladders - 3,072 violations
Occupational fatalities caused by falls remain a serious public health
problem. The US Department of Labor (DOL) lists falls as one of the leading
causes of traumatic occupational death, accounting for eight percent of all
occupational fatalities from trauma.

8. Powered Industrial Trucks - 2,993 violations
Each year, tens of thousands of injuries related to powered industrial trucks
(PIT), or forklifts, occur in US workplaces. Many employees are injured when
lift trucks are inadvertently driven off loading docks, lifts fall between
docks and an unsecured trailer, they are struck by a lift truck, or when they
fall while on elevated pallets and tines.

9. Electrical - 2,556 violations
Working with electricity can be dangerous. Engineers, electricians, and other
professionals work with electricity directly, including working on overhead
lines, cable harnesses, and circuit assemblies. Others, such as office workers
and sales people, work with electricity indirectly and may also be exposed to
electrical hazards.

10.Machine Guarding - 2,364 violations
Any machine part, function, or process that may cause injury must be
safeguarded. When the operation of a machine or accidental contact injures the
operator or others in the vicinity, the hazards must be eliminated or
controlled.

The final report on the Top 10 for 2009 violations will be published in the
December edition of NSC's Safety+Health magazine.

The National Safety Council (www.nsc.org) saves lives by preventing injuries
and deaths at work, in homes and communities, and on the roads, through
leadership, research, education and advocacy.

Safety in the Aerial Lift Market
BY David G. Allie
 
Scissor lifts and boom lifts have replaced ladders and scaffolding on many job sites and, because of their mobility and flexibility, they have improved production.
 
But in my years of working around this type of equipment, I have found that training is taken for granted. Most employers think their employees know how to operate this equipment safely. OSHA does not consider just watching a video “training.” OSHA says, in fact, that if you use a video for training on aerial lifts, a competent person must be there to answer questions. Let’s cover some of those questions now.
 
 
 
 
OSHA QuickTakes